Post by Daniel (commish, agent) on Jul 5, 2024 14:15:52 GMT 1
Unless you've been living under a rock, you've noticed we've had plenty of disagreements lately.
Now it is my unfortunate task to try to come up with a ruling.
Having taken everything into account (thus no need to post more below, pretty please), I'd like to propose the following:
1.
-
-
trade
Does not meet the requirements of a sufficiently balanced trade.
According to the rules, Dylan has 2 options - please post below:
1A - the trade goes through without the
2018 1st, or
1B - the trade is nullified.
(Btw you may decide independently from what Pearl says, since she ok'ed the trade originally.)
2.
-
trade
Does not meet the requirements stipulated twice in the welcome email. As pointed out in this post, I don't think a hard rule would work best here. I'd like to continue to allow genius trades immediately, but questionable trades only 2-3 weeks after joining. (Btw loving Joni's idea for a future list of tasks to complete / CBA quiz.)
In order not to completely screw Dylan, he again has 2 options - please post below:
2A - the trade gets modified to #47 for one out of the two future picks of your choosing, or
2B - the trade is forgotten, you may make pick #47 yourself. Please kindly have mercy and don't pick the undrafted player in question out of sheer spite, for the sake of my head not exploding.
(Either choice restarts the draft.)
(@ryan: if 2B chosen by Dylan, feel free to immediately trade one of the two future picks of your choosing with anybody picking #48, #49, #50, or #51. Trust me, won't be hard. If unsuccessful,
automatically agree to give you #52 so that you can pick your main man.)
3. Yes, I dream of a world where you can publicly call my basketball decision stupid today and I will not remember it when discussing anything else tomorrow.
Now it is my unfortunate task to try to come up with a ruling.
Having taken everything into account (thus no need to post more below, pretty please), I'd like to propose the following:
1.
![SAC](http://storage.proboards.com/7066983/images/kKHBnpOXxCGuRybXUwXs.png)
![PHX](http://storage.proboards.com/7066983/images/dXlWKncLDulCwzYUgu0F.png)
![CHI](http://storage.proboards.com/7066983/images/pmhvUxaxcTacbeupTBFn.png)
Does not meet the requirements of a sufficiently balanced trade.
According to the rules, Dylan has 2 options - please post below:
1A - the trade goes through without the
![SAC](http://storage.proboards.com/7066983/images/kKHBnpOXxCGuRybXUwXs.png)
1B - the trade is nullified.
(Btw you may decide independently from what Pearl says, since she ok'ed the trade originally.)
2.
![PHX](http://storage.proboards.com/7066983/images/dXlWKncLDulCwzYUgu0F.png)
![POR](http://storage.proboards.com/7066983/images/HyJzKffGBKyoErdNpVbI.png)
Does not meet the requirements stipulated twice in the welcome email. As pointed out in this post, I don't think a hard rule would work best here. I'd like to continue to allow genius trades immediately, but questionable trades only 2-3 weeks after joining. (Btw loving Joni's idea for a future list of tasks to complete / CBA quiz.)
In order not to completely screw Dylan, he again has 2 options - please post below:
2A - the trade gets modified to #47 for one out of the two future picks of your choosing, or
2B - the trade is forgotten, you may make pick #47 yourself. Please kindly have mercy and don't pick the undrafted player in question out of sheer spite, for the sake of my head not exploding.
(Either choice restarts the draft.)
(@ryan: if 2B chosen by Dylan, feel free to immediately trade one of the two future picks of your choosing with anybody picking #48, #49, #50, or #51. Trust me, won't be hard. If unsuccessful,
![GSW](http://storage.proboards.com/7066983/images/ommSRGIGWxEgzYWtujmT.png)
3. Yes, I dream of a world where you can publicly call my basketball decision stupid today and I will not remember it when discussing anything else tomorrow.